Arkansas’ highest court has rejected the attorney general’s request that it speed the appeal of his unsuccessful lawsuit against the state prison board.
According to Arkansas Advocate, the Arkansas Supreme Court in a Thursday order denied AG Tim Griffin’s motion for expedited consideration of his Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the Board of Corrections, which was dismissed by a lower court in January.
The court did not take up Griffin’s motion that it disqualify the private law firm the prison board hired as special counsel to represent it in litigation against Griffin and Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders.
On Thursday afternoon, Griffin said: “I look forward to defending our case before the Arkansas Supreme Court.”
The case is one of many facets in the ongoing dispute between the Board of Correction and Sanders, Griffin and other state officials, and a group of lawmakers Thursday afternoon reiterated calls for board member Alonza Jiles to resign over allegations in a civil lawsuit that he covered up child sexual abuse at a youth camp.
Griffin sued the Board of Corrections over alleged FOIA violations shortly after it filed a lawsuit of its own against Sanders and former Corrections Secretary Joe Profiri over control of the state prison system.
The FOIA suit accused the Board of Corrections of violating the state’s open meetings law when it entered executive session during a pair of December meetings. The suit also challenged the board’s legal authority to retain attorney Abtin Mehdizadegan and Hall Booth Smith law firm.
Griffin also said the board failed to properly respond to a public records request from his office earlier in December, and he has continued to take issue with the board’s use of private sessions.
Pulaski County Circuit Judge Tim Fox gave Griffin and his staff 30 days to work with the Board of Corrections on an agreement with an outside attorney.
Fox tossed the suit last month, ruling Griffin’s office “failed to make material or good faith efforts to initiate” the statutory procedure that allows special counsel to represent state officials and entities.
While a majority of the Supreme Court declined to expedite the appeal or take up the motion to disqualify the outside law firm, Associate Justice Shawn Womack would have granted the motion to expedite and taken the motion to disqualify counsel. Associate Justice Barbara Webb agreed that expedited consideration should be denied, but she would’ve taken the motion to disqualify.
Read more on ArkansasAdvocate.com.
WebReadyTM Powered by WireReady® NSI